Vladimir S. Bibler understands the philosophy as the dialogical onto-logic, or the logic of pre-supposing and mutual grounding of the epochal forms of the paradoxical identity of thinking and being. The definite idea of the identity of thinking and being contains a certain logic of truth, but this identity and so the logic of truth is paradox

Plato defines the event of thinking as a silent dialogue of the soul with itself about what it means to think of. Three personages, each of them being other to each other, take part in the dialogue: what is meant to be understood is being; he who does the work of understanding is an intelligent soul formed together with the thought; the one who is meant to be communicated what is understood to is other, co-participator of thinking. Between this three extra-logical limits – the being – the mind – the other – the Logos of thinking unfolds. Philosophy deals with the logic (structure) of this logos. Just here and just this way does philosophy exist as logic. This logic can be called dialogical ontogo-logic (archeo-logic, noo-logic).

The article is the extract from the introduction to the not yet finish work named «Essays on the Dialogical Onto-logic».