Везде
The Place of historical Science in the System of contemporary Knowledge
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
The Place of historical Science in the System of contemporary Knowledge
Annotation
PII
S004287440006323-0-
DOI
10.31857/S004287440006323-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Kseniya Khvostova 
Affiliation: Institute of World History
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Issue 9
Pages
108-117
Abstract

The problem of the place of historical science in the structure of modern knowledge is connected with ideas of leaders of contemporary synergetic I. Prigogine and K. Mainzer. The scientists substantiate the presence in contemporary science of tendency to rapprochement of natural and historical knowledge. The author intends to analyse the multiplicity of links between history and other sciences. From the viewpoint of author the influence of history on the contemporary science consists in the great role in framework of contemporary post-non-classical paradigm of narrativism, detailism, plurality, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity. The author believes that the concept of transdisciplinarity is the enlargement of historical comparative interpretation. The influence of contemporary post-non-classical paradigm on historical knowledge consists in the application of mathematic in historical researches. The article shows the specific features of application of statistic and differential equations and analyses the great role of induction on historical studies. It pays attention to the problem of specific role of theoretical and phenomenological levels of historical science. The author takes in account the role of ideas of constructivism in historical studies. She aims to study the role and limits of application of synergetic in historical researches and examines the role of temporality in the historical knowledge. The author turns to her personal scientific practice and illustrates the features of historical study on the examples of byzantine history. The article stresses the strategies of positivism and post-positivism in the estimation of the role of historical investigations in the system of contemporary knowledge. Its focus is on the role of linguistic and psychological research methods.

Keywords
historical science, synergetic, narrativism, detailism, interdisciplinarity, post-non-classical paradigm, constructivism, induction, postmodernism, mathematical method, transdisciplinarity, psychological and linguistic methods
Received
22.09.2019
Date of publication
24.09.2019
Number of purchasers
89
Views
870
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S004287440006323-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 24.08.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Aggazi, Evandro (2010) ‘Epistemology and the Social Loop’, Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 7 (2010), pp. 56–66 (Russian Translation).

2. Bauman, Sigmund (1993) Philosophy and Postmodernistic Sociology, Voprosy filosofii, Vol. 3 (1993), pp. 46–51 (Russian translation).

3. Boudon, Raymond (1968) L'analyse mathe?matique des faits sociaux. Plon, Paris, 1968.

4. Durkheim, E?mile (1950) Les regles de la methode sociologique, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris (Russian Translation)

5. Karpenko, Alexander S. (2017) ‘Logic of Determinism and Phenomenon of Past’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 9 (2017), pp. 160–178 (in Russian).

6. Khvostova, Kseniya V. (1968) The Specific Features of Agrarian-juridical Relations in Byzance in XIII–XIV Century, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

7. Khvostova, Kseniya V. (2009) Byzantine Civilization as Historical Paradigm. Aleteiya, Moscow (in Russian).

8. Lektorsky, Vladislav A. (2017) Cognition, Action, Reality, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 9 (2017), pp. 3–22 (in Russian).

9. Mainzer, Klaus (2010) ‘Calls of Complexity in 21st Century. Interdisciplinary Introduction’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 10 (2010), pp. 84–98 (Russian Translation).

10. Mikeshina, Liudmila A. (2016) Contemporary Epistemology of humanitarian Knowledge: interdisciplinary synthesizes, ROSSPEN, Moscow, 2016, pp. 3–462 (in Russian).

11. Miller, David (2012) ‘Machine Guessing’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 7 (2012), pp. 110–119 (Russian Translation).

12. Petrenko, Viktor F. (2011) ‘Constructivism as a New Paradigm in Human Sciences’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 6 (2011), pp. 75–81 (in Russian).

13. Prigogine, Ilya (1989) ‘The Re-Discovery of Time’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 8 (1989), pp. 3–18 (Russian Translation).

14. Prigogine Ilya (1991) ‘The Philosophy of Instability’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 6 (1991), pp. 46–52 (Russian Translation).

15. Repina, Lorina P. (2011) History at the Border of XX–XXI Centuries: Social Theories and Historiographical Practice, Nauka, Moscow (in Russian).

16. Shchedrina, Irina O. (2017) ‘The New Aspects of Narratology’, Voprosy Filosofii, Vol. 9 (2017), pp. 82–90 (in Russian).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate