Везде
Electronic evidence in the field of labor dispute resolution: challenges of law en-forcement and problems of legal science
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Electronic evidence in the field of labor dispute resolution: challenges of law en-forcement and problems of legal science
Annotation
PII
S013207690006241-7-
DOI
10.31857/S013207690006241-7
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Larisa Zaitseva 
Affiliation: Tyumen state University
Address: Russian Federation, Tyumen
Nadezhda Sukhova
Affiliation: Tyumen state University
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Issue 8
Pages
43-52
Abstract

The problem of the influence of digital technologies used in the management and organization of labor as well as labor relations on the process of judicial review of labor disputes is considered in the proposed article. Analysis of judicial practice of proving relevant circumstances necessary for the resolution of labor disputes with the use of electronic evidence raises a number of theoretical and practical problems related to the transformation of the labor and civil procedural law. Modern law does not have sufficient funds for adequate legal regulation of material and procedural legal relations in the connection with the application of new information technologies. Partly the shortcomings of legislative regulation are compensated by local regulation of labor relations and judicial practice.

Keywords
individual labor disputes, averment, electronic evidence, protection of labor rights, local regulatory legal acts
Received
19.08.2019
Date of publication
20.09.2019
Number of purchasers
90
Views
2524
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013207690006241-7-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.08.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Babkova O. Wiki-interpretation for a common understanding // the EZH-Lawyer. 2011. No. 43. P. 5 (in Russ.).

2. Barabash A.S. the Main, additional and auxiliary processes of proof in the stages of preliminary investigation and trial. M., 2017 (in Russ.).

3. Bessonova A.I. Review of the results of the expert group "National and supranational mechanisms of civil process development at the present stage" in the framework of the XI session of the European-Asian Congress in Yekaterinburg // Vestnik of civil process. Vol. 7. 2017. No. 4. P. 201, 202 (in Russ.).

4. Bonner A.T. Electronic justice: reality or a new-fangled term? // Herald of civil procedure. Vol. 8. 2018. No. 1. P. 22 - 38 (in Russ.).

5. Borisova E.A. Audio and video recording: advantages and disadvantages // Vestnik of civil procedure. Vol. 8. 2018. No. 1. P. 39–50 (in Russ.).

6. Wackowski Yu. F. Domain disputes. Protection of trademarks and trade names. M., 2009. P. 125 (in Russ.).

7. Visher L. Legal and economic view on the harmonization of procedural law (A law and Economics View on harmonization of Procedural Law) // Kramer X., Rhee C. H. van (ed.). Globalization of Civil Procedural Law. Springer, 2011.

8. Gorelov M.V. The Role of civil and administrative proceedings in the development of the economy of the Russian Federation: collection of scientific articles International. science.-prakt. conf. "Actual problems of development of the civil process, Rostov-on-Don, April 12, 2018. Rostov n/D., 2018 (in Russ.).

9. Gorelov M.V. Electronic evidence in civil proceedings of Russia: theory and practice. Ekaterinburg, 2005 (in Russ.).

10. Greger R. Judge as an Internet surfer. Clarification of the circumstances of the case on the Internet // Vestnik of civil procedure. Vol. 7. 2017. No. 4. P. 164 - 166, 168, 172 (in Russ.).

11. Zhizhina M.V. Theory and practice of application of modern criminology in the civil process: dis. ... Doctor of Law. M., 2016 (in Russ.).

12. Kostyan I.A., Kurennoy A.M., Khnykin G.V. Labor Law and the digital economy: combined do they? // Labor Law in Russia and abroad. 2017. No. 4. P. 10 - 12 (in Russ.).

13. Laptev V.A. Electronic evidence in the arbitration process // Ross. justice. 2017. No. 2. P. 56–59 (in Russ.).

14. Reshetnyak V.I., Smagina E.S. Information technologies in civil proceedings (Russian and foreign experience): proc. benefit. M., 2017. P. 28 (in Russ.).

15. Saveliev A.I. Use of materials is the Internet archive Wayback Machine as evidence in the arbitration process // Vestnik of Supreme Arbitration Court of the Russian Federation. 2013. No. 12. P. 78–94 (in Russ.).

16. Sitdikova R.I., Valeev G.A. Review of the IV Annual Symposium of the Journal of civil procedure "2017 – Electronic justice and information technologies in civil proceedings" // Journal of civil procedure. Vol. 7. 2017. No. 6. P. 263–271 (in Russ.).

17. Sukhova N.V., Filippov S.S. New types of evidence in the trial: questions of theory and practice // Problems of civil law and procedure: collection of scientific articles; editorial Board: I. Martynenko (ed.) [et al.]. Grodno, 2017. P. 386–400 (in Russ.).

18. Terekhova L.A. Information technologies in the practice of arbitration courts // Vestnik of civil procedure. Vol. 7. 2017. No. 6. P. 34–42 (in Russ.).

19. Fedotov N.N. Forensics – computer forensics. M., 2007 (in Russ.).

20. Brehm. Rechtsforbildungszweck des Zivilprozesses // Schumann F.S. [2001]. P. 57.

21. Civil litigation in China and Europe: essays on the role of the judge and the parties / by C.H. van Rhee (editor), Yulin Fu (editor.). Dordrecht [Netherlands]; Beijing [China], 2014. Ð. 1 - 7, 264 - 267.

22. Evidence in contemporary civil procedure: fundamental issues in a comparative perspective / by C.H. van Rhee (editor) (author), Alan Uzelac (editor; author.) Cambridge, United Kingdom; Antwerp [Belgium]; Portland [Oregon], 2015. Ð. 3 - 8; 243 - 308.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate