Везде
Review of the methodological seminar on the theme “Digital Law: the methodology of the study” (18 April 2019, Saratov state Law Academy, Saratov branch of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences)
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Review of the methodological seminar on the theme “Digital Law: the methodology of the study” (18 April 2019, Saratov state Law Academy, Saratov branch of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences)
Annotation
PII
S013207690006253-0-
DOI
10.31857/S013207690006253-0
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Alexander Malko 
Occupation: Director of Saratov branch of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: Saratov branch of the Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Saratov
Natalya V. Krotkova
ORCID: 0000-0003-2853-1287
Occupation: Leading research fellow, sector of Constitutional Law and Constitutional justice, Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Vice-Editor-in-Chief of journal “State and Law” of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Affiliation: The Institute of State and Law of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Sergey Afanasev
Affiliation: Saratov state Law Academy
Address: Russian Federation
Viktoriya Borisova
Affiliation: Saratov state Law Academy
Address: Russian Federation
Edition
Issue 8
Pages
122-128
Abstract

The relevance of the publication of the materials of the methodological seminar is due to the hyperactive pace of digitalization of justice in the absence of proper legal regulation by the civil procedural legislation. The purpose of the methodological seminar – analysis of the state automated system "Justice", certain aspects of e-justice in civil cases, areas of development of the concept of legislation in the field of digitalization of civil process.

Keywords
e-justice, digitalization, civil case
Acknowledgment
The study was supported by RFBR, research project No. 18-29-16111
Received
20.08.2019
Date of publication
20.09.2019
Number of purchasers
90
Views
2866
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S013207690006253-0-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 18.08.2019
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Burdina E.V. Audioproducer: concept, distinctive characteristics and role in the mechanism of judicial protection of the // Administrator of the Court. 2016. No. 4. P. 19–24 (in Russ.).

2. Vas’kovsky E.V. Textbook of civil procedure. M., 2017. P. 228 (in Russ.).

3. Kraynyuchenko I.V., Popov V.P. System Outlook: theory and analysis. Pyatigorsk, 2005. URL: http://holism.narod.ru/Systems/content.htm (in Russ.).

4. Lomakin A. Digitalisation Law // Labor Law. 2017. No. 9. P. 103 - 111 (in Russ.).

5. Mal’ko A.V., Rezchikov A.F., Ivashchenko V.A. and others. Legal policy in the field of in-formation security in the Internet: process modeling // Legal science and law enforcement practice. 2017. No. 2. P. 72 - 81 (in Russ.).

6. The Moscow city court will introduce a program of automatic preparation of the Protocol of judicial proceedings. URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/mosgorsud-vnedrit-programmu-avtomaticheskoy-podgotovki-protokola-sudebnogo-zasedaniya/ (in Russ.).

7. Natasha Singer Facebook's Push for Facial Recognition Prompts Privacy Alarms. URL: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/09/technology/facebook-facial-recognition-privacy.html?emc=edit_ne_20180709&nl=evening-briefing&nlid=6067543320180709&te=1

8. Talapina E.V. Law and digitalization: new challenges and prospects // Journal of Ross. Law. 2018. No. 2. P. 5 - 17 (in Russ.).

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate