- PII
- S020595920026153-4-
- DOI
- 10.31857/S020595920026153-4
- Publication type
- Article
- Status
- Published
- Authors
- Volume/ Edition
- Volume 44 / Issue 3
- Pages
- 18-25
- Abstract
The objective of the research was to test the hypothesis about the relationship between the features of communicative situations and the perception of a stranger. Three types of situations were used, differing in the degree of the observer's involvement in communication: 1. looking at a photo image of the sitter, 2. watching a video with the sitter in communication, 3. communicating with the sitter “face to face”. It has been shown that the dynamics of interpersonal evaluations are multidirectional and depend rather on the diagnostic metrics used. Thus, the values of adequacy of evaluation of individual psychological features of the sitter are higher in the situation of photo perception as compared to the situations of video perception and face-to-face communication, at the same time the values of complexity of interpersonal evaluation (number of choices of neutral evaluation “0”) are lower in the situation of face-to-face communication and the situation of video perception as compared to the situation of photo perception. The study revealed the dynamics of interpersonal evaluations in different communicative situations, i.e. it was shown how situations influence the way the perception of a communication partner is formed.
- Keywords
- ontological approach, interpersonal perception, communicative situation, evaluation adequacy, personal qualities
- Date of publication
- 28.06.2023
- Year of publication
- 2023
- Number of purchasers
- 12
- Views
- 590
References
- 1. Barabanshhikov V.A., Nosulenko V.N. Sistemnost'. Vosprijatie. Obshhenie. Moscow: IP RAN, 2004. (In Russian)
- 2. Gibson Dzh. Jekologicheskij podhod k zritel'nomu vosprijatiju. Tr. from engl. A.D. Logvinenko. Moscow: Izd. KoLibri, 1988. 464 p. (In Russian)
- 3. Grishina N.V. Problema konceptualizacii konteksta v sovremennoj psihologii. Social'naja psihologija i obshhestvo. 2018. V. 9. № 3. P. 10–20. (In Russian)
- 4. Demidov A.A. Jekologicheskij podhod k izucheniju mezhlichnostnogo vosprijatija: metodologija i rezul'taty issledovanij. Poznanie i perezhivanie. 2022. V. 3. № 1. P. 6 –27. (In Russian)
- 5. Zhiznennoe prostranstvo v psihologii: Teorija i fenomenologija: sbornik statej. Eds. N.V. Grishinoj, S.N. Kostrominoj. Saint-Petersburg.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb.un-ta, 2020. 532 p. (In Russian)
- 6. Levin K. Dinamicheskaja psihologija. Izbrannye trudy. Tr. from engl. and germ. E. Patjaeva, D. Leont'eva. Moscow: Smysl, 2001. 572 p. (In Russian)
- 7. Ross L., Nisbett R. Chelovek i situacija. Perspektivy social'noj psihologii Tr. from engl. V.V. Rumynskogo; Eds. E.N. Emel'janova, V.S. Maguna. Moscow: Aspekt Press, 1999. 429 p. (In Russian)
- 8. Cooper W.H., Withey M.J. The strong situation hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2009. V. 13. № 1. P. 62–72.
- 9. Funder D.C. Personality judgment: A realistic approach to person perception. Academic Press, 1999.
- 10. Funder D.C. Taking situations seriously: The situation construal model and the Riverside Situational Q-sort. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2016. V. 25. № 3. P 203–208.
- 11. Kenny D.A. PERSON: A General Model of Interpersonal Perception. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2004. V. 8. № 3. P. 265–280.
- 12. Magnusson D. Toward a psychology of situations: An interactional perspective. Hillsdale New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1981.
- 13. McArthur L.Z., Baron R.M. Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review. 1983. V. 90. P. 215–238.
- 14. Rauthmann J.F., Sherman R.A. Toward a Research Agenda for the Study of Situation Perceptions: A Variance Componential Framework. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 2019. V. 23. № 3. P. 238–266.
- 15. Rauthmann J.F., Sherman R.A. The Situation of Situation Research: Knowns and Unknowns. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2020. V. 29. № 5. P. 473–480.
- 16. Shoda Y., Mischel W. Reconciling contextualism with the core assumptions of personality psychology. European Journal of Personality. 2000. V. 14. № 5. P. 407–428.
