United States Policy toward Global South Information and Communication Technology Sector Development Assistance: Problems and Prospects
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
United States Policy toward Global South Information and Communication Technology Sector Development Assistance: Problems and Prospects
Annotation
PII
S268667300009769-5-
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Zorikto Gomboin 
Affiliation:
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Radio Research and Development Institute
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Pages
40-59
Abstract

This article is aimed at analysing the U.S policy in assisting digitalization of Global South countries. To achieve this aim we look at the current situation of the U.S official development assistance flows to ICT sector – more specifically, we study official policy documents, agencies involved, compare the aid flows, determine regional and country assistance priorities. Furthermore, this article is specifically targeting the most recent developments in this sector, given the rising technological competition between the U.S. and China, in particular in regards to 5G deployment. U.S. is significantly behind its peer competitor China when compared by the assistance flows to the developing world. This fact enables many politicians and think tanks to push for renewed efforts in this direction. It has already forced trade facilitation agencies to deploy massive programmes in the Global South, and the development aid agencies will undoubtedly follow this lead soon. However, this new ICT sector aid will not only be locked for American businesses only, but also will come with some other strings attached, including cybersecurity and cross-border data flows regulation change conditions.

Keywords
United States, China, development aid, official development assistance, information and communication technologies, ICT, ICT for development, ICT4D, digital economy, technological competition
Received
30.03.2020
Date of publication
09.06.2020
Number of purchasers
36
Views
3353
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Previous versions
S268667300009769-5-1 Дата внесения правок в статью - 21.05.2020
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Ashmyanskaya I.S. 2011. Inostrannaya pomosch' razvitiyu v sfere informatsionno-kommunikatsionnykh tekhnologij. Vestnik MGIMO Universiteta. № 5. S. 77–86.

2. Bartenev V.I. 2019a. Amerikanskaya pomosch' Egiptu posle nachala «arabskoj vesny»: vnutrennie i vneshnie determinanty. SShA & Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. № 8. S. 54–74. DOI: 10.31857/S032120680005967-7

3. Bartenev V.I. 2019b. Spetsifika podkhodov administratsii D. Trampa k strategicheskomu ispol'zovaniyu resursov vneshnej pomoschi v nestandartnykh regionakh mira (na primere Blizhnego Vostoka i Severnoj Afriki). Menyayuschijsya Zapad i ego rol' v regulirovanii global'nykh protsessov (Mirovoe razvitie). № 21. S. 168–179.

4. Bartenev V.I. 2018. Pomogat' khrupkim gosudarstvam skvoz' prizmu riska-menedzhmenta: labirint ob'yasnitel'nykh gipotez. Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. № 4. S. 20–41.

5. Beletskaya M.Yu. 2019. Perspektivy uchastiya SShA v sisteme sodruzhestva mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu. SShA & Kanada: ehkonomika, politika, kul'tura. № 12. S. 37–52. DOI: 10.31857/S268667300007687-5

6. Inostrannaya pomosch'. 2013 / Pod red. L.M. Kapitsy. M.: MGIMO-Universitet. 652 s.

7. Sodejstvie mezhdunarodnomu razvitiyu kak instrument vneshnej politiki: zarubezhnyj opyt. 2018 / Pod red. V.G. Baranovskogo, Yu.D. Kvashnina, N.V. Toga-novoj. M.: IMEhMO RAN, 248 s.

8. Shakirov A.R. 2012. SShA: ofitsial'naya pomosch' razvitiyu. Mirovaya ehkonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. № 3. S. 43–51.

9. Gunkel D.J. 2003. Second Thoughts: toward a Critique of the Digital Divide. New Media & Society. V. 5. No. 4. P. 499-522.

10. Horrocks I., Pratchett L. 1995. Democracy and New Technology. Nottingham: Trent University. 208 p.

11. Howland J. 1998. The ‘Digital Divide’: Are we becoming a world of technological ‘haves’ and ‘have‐nots?’. The Electronic Library. T. 16. № 5. pp. 287–289

12. Schia N. 2016 ‘Teach a person how to surf’: Cyber Security as Development Assistance. Oslo: Norwegian Institute of International Affairs Report. P. 1-36.

13. Tsagarousianou R. 2000. Electronic Democracy in Practice: One, Two, Three... Countless Variants. Hermès. T. 2. P. 6-27.

14. Winner L. 1980. Do Artifacts Have Politics? Daedalus. V. 109. No. 1.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate