China builds its own socialism
Table of contents
Share
QR
Metrics
China builds its own socialism
Annotation
PII
S013128120000159-5-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Luidmila Kondrashova 
Occupation: chief researcher
Affiliation: Institute of Far Eastern Studies, Russian Academy of Sciences
Address: Russian Federation, Moscow
Edition
Pages
102-114
Abstract

The revolution of 1949 in China marked the country's transition from “bureaucratic feudalism” to the construction of a socialist society. The beginning of the policy of reforms (1978–1979) is now interpreted as the “second revolution” — the transition from “state socialism” to “market socialism”. As can be seen from the decisions of the 19th CPC Congress, China is now launching a new round of socio-economic development aimed at combining 190 Summary the personal interests of citizens with public and state interests. The new turn of reforms can be described as the “third Chinese revolution” with dramatic consequences for the entire social structure. Mixed political system,  combining strong centralized power with party-government management and democratic leadership at the grass-roots administrative level, will correspond to a multi-layered market economy.

Keywords
China, capitalism, socialism, theory of institutional matrices, market, state macro-regulation, convergence, mixed economy, Chinese model
Received
30.09.2018
Date of publication
02.10.2018
Number of purchasers
10
Views
1317
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf

References

1. Sm., naprimer: Kirdina S.G. Institutsional'nye matritsy i razvitie Rossii. Vvedenie v Kh-Y teoriyu. M.; SPb., 2014

2. Gollandskij ehkonomist i istorik Andre Frank v svoej rabote «Vozvraschenie k vostochnym istokam: global'naya ehkonomika i vek Azii» (Frank A. Re-Orient. Global Economy in the Asian Age. Berkley, 1998) utverzhdaet, chto Kitaj po suschestvu sozdal pervuyu sistemu mezhdunarodnoj torgovli i byl glavnym tsentrom pervogo global'nogo ehkonomicheskogo rynka, kotoryj prokhodil po Shelkovomu puti.

3. I.B. Chubajs nazyvaet ehto «nasiliem vesternizatsiej». Sm.: Globalistika: Ehntsiklopediya. M.: TsNPP «Dialog», 2003. S. 190.

4. Nepomnin O.E., Men'shikov V.B. Sintez v perekhodnom obschestve. Kitaj na grani ehpokh. M.: Vost. lit., 1999. S. 280–289.

5. Tam zhe.

6. Tam zhe. S. 246

7. Ustyuzhanina E.V. Problemy razvitiya otnoshenij sobstvennosti v sovremennoj rossijskoj ehkonomike. M., 2006. S. 58–60.

8. Dehn Syaopin. Izbrannoe (1975–1982). Pekin, 1985. S. 196–197.

9. Dehn Syaopin vehn'syuan': [Izbrannoe Dehn Syaopina]. Pekin, 1993. T. 3. S. 372.

10. Chzhehnlun' yuj fachzhan'. Chzhungo tszintszisyueh 50 nyan': [Diskussii i razvitie: 50 let ehkonomicheskoj teorii v Kitae]. Kun'min, 1999. S. 59.

11. Zhehn'min' zhibao. 09.11.2012. S. 2.

12. Kouz Ronal'd, Van Nin. Kak Kitaj stal kapitalisticheskim / per. s angl. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2016.

13. Tyan' Vehjmin'. Shichan shehkhuehjchzhui gotszya lilun': tsziyuj yan'tszin' guan'tszyueh dy igeh shupin: [Teoriya rynochnogo sotsializma: opisanie ehvolyutsii vzglyadov] // Tszintszi tichzhi gajgeh. 2010. № 4. S. 23.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate