Везде
Organization of American States (OAS): a typical and a unique international structure
Table of contents
Annotation Estimate Publication content
References Comments
Share
QR
Metrics
Organization of American States (OAS): a typical and a unique international structure
Annotation
PII
S0044748X0000619-9-1
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Aleksandr Kutejnikov 
Edition
Issue 5
Pages
15-31
Abstract
Organization of American States (OAS) is the typical international organization, but at the same time it is the only one of its kind in multilateral diplomacy structures. This paradox is explained by the artificial character of the OAS and all the class of International Intergovernmental Organizations, to whom it belongs. A historical and sociological approach, used in this article, argues how OAS has evolved from the instrument of the regional security safeguarding to a democracy promotion mechanism. As an artificial structure OAS has a number of characteristics arbitrarily attributed to it by member-states and individuals, who established it and work in organization. Been an organization it gets objective qualities and try to safeguard itself as a societal and political body of international system
Keywords
LATIN AMERICA, USA, DEMOCRACY PROMOTION, ORGANIZATIONS OF AMERICAN STATES, REGIONAL SECURITY
Date of publication
01.05.2012
Number of purchasers
1
Views
960
Readers community rating
0.0 (0 votes)
Cite   Download pdf
1 продвижение сайтов яндекс продвижение сайтов в поисковых системах https://flokinh.com сео продвижение сайта в интернете
продвижение сайтов яндекс продвижение сайтов в поисковых системах https://flokinh.com сео продвижение сайта в интернете

References



Additional sources and materials

1. Q.S.P. Stands, P. Klein. Bowett's Law of International Institutions. London, 2009, p. 15-16. 
 2. Charter of the Organization of American States. - O.C. Stoetzer. The Organization of American States. New York, Washington, London, 1965, p. 117. 
 3. G. Kennedy, T. Felicio. Regional Security and Global Governance. A Study of Interaction Between Regional Agencies and the UN Security Council With a Proposal for Regional-Global Security Mechanism. Brussels, 2006, p. 196. 
 4. G. PopeAtkins. Latin America in the International Political System. New York, London, 1977, p. 307. 
 5. Treaties and Alliance of the Worlds. A Survey of International Treaties in Force and Communities of States. New York etc., 1968, p. 106. 
 6. G. PopeAtkins. Op. cit., p. 316. 
 7. The Inter-American System. Treaties, conventions & Other Documents. Vol. I. Leagal-Political Affairs. Part II. London etc., p. 282-283. 
 8. G. Kennedy, T. Felicio. Op. cit., p. 192. 
 9. Sm., naprimer: J. Child. Geopolitical Conflicts in South America. - Security in the Americas. Washington, 1989, p. 307-327. 
 10. R.J. Vincent. Nonintervention and International Order. Princeton, 1974, p. 255-256. 
 11. G. Fonseca. The United States and Latin America: Multilateralism and International Legitimacy. - Unilateralism and U.S. Foreign Policy. Boulder, London, 2003, p. 330. 
 12. J. Lloyd Mecham. The United States and Inter-American Security, 1889-1960. Austin, 1962, p. 427. 
 13. Treaties and Alliance of the Worlds. A Survey of International Treaties in Force and Communities of States, p. 107. 
 14. Treaties and Alliance of the Worlds. A Survey of International Treaties in Force and Communities of States, p. 109-110. 
 15. A.L. Bennet. International Organizations. Principles and Issues. Cliffs, 1991, p. 222. 
 16. J. Bercovitch, J. Fretter. Regional Guide to International Conflict and Management from 1945 to 2003. Washington, 2004, p. 121. 
 17. Vostok/Zapad. Regional'nye podsistemy i regional'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij. M., 2002, s. 105. 
 18. D. Armstrong, L. Lloyd, J. Redmond. From Versailles to Maastricht, p. 219. 
 19. A. Fenton. Canada's contribution to Democracy Promotion. - Canadian Dimension. Vol. 40, Issue 6, November/December 2006, p. 27 (27-31). 
 20. Mezhdunarodnye organizatsii. M., 1994, s. 168. 
 21. J. Mousse. Le contentieux des organisations internationals et de l'Union Europeenne. Bruxelles, 1997, p. 10-12. 
 22. J. Bercovitch, J. Fretter. Regional Guide to International Conflict and Management from 1945 to 2003. Washington, 2004, p. 125. 
 23. M. Carmagnani. The Other West. Latin America from Invasion to Globalization. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, 2011, p. 207-208. 
 24. J. Bercovitch, J. Fretter. Op. cit., p. 122. 
 25. Background Paper Prepared by the Officer in Charge of U.S. OAS Delegation Matters (Redington). - http://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1958-60v05/d90 
 26. The Inter-American System. Treaties, conventions & Other Documents. Vol. I. Leagal-Political Affairs. Part II, p. 23, 330. 
 27. R. Mackenzie, C. Romano, Y. Shany, P. Sands. Manual on International Courts and Tribunals. Oxford, 2010, p. 366. 
 28. M. Carmagnani. Op. cit., p. 208. 
 29. C.R. Thomas. The Organization of American States in Its 50th Year. Overview of a Regional Commitment, p. 11. 
 30. F. Dopagne. Les contre-mesures des organisation internationales. Leuven, 2010, p. 134. 
 31. P. Calvert. Latin America: Internal Conflict and International Peace. London etc., 1969, p. 145. 
 32. J.D. Henderson, H. Delpart, M. Brungardt. A reference Guide to Latin American History. Armonk, London, 2000, p. 225. 
 33. A Companion to Latin American History. Malden, Oxford, Carlton, 2008, p. 372. 
 34. D. Vud, Zh. Serre. Diplomaticheskij tseremonial i protokol. M., 1976, s. 391. 
 35. J.D. Henderson, H. Delpart, M. Brungardt. Op. cit., p. 226; A Companion to Latin American History, p. 377. 
 36. Genassambleya OAG ob'yavila ob otmene rezolyutsii 1962 goda, soglasno kotoroj Kuba byla isklyuchena iz ryadov organizatsii 2009-06-04. - Agentstvo Sin'khua, http://russian.cri.cn 
 37. F. Dopagne. Op. cit., p.134. 
 38. G. Ochoa. Honduras Returns to the OAS. -http://www.oas.org/en/americas/article 
 39. Contemporary Practice of the United States. - The American Journal of International Law, 2009, vol. 103, N 3, p. 585-586. 
 40. M. Carmagnani. Op. cit., p. 208. 
 41. Vostok/Zapad. Regional'nye podsistemy i regional'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij, s. 118-120. 
 42. The Charter of Punta del Este, Establishing an Alliance for Progress Within the Framework of Operation Pan America // The Alliance for Progress. Problems and Perspectives. Baltimore, 1962. p. 118. 
 43. Alliance for Progress an American Partnership. Washington, 1963, P. 6, 8, 14. 
 44. W.D. Roger. The Twilight Struggle: The Alliance for Progress and the Politics of Development in Latin America. New York, 1967, p. 45. 
 45. Vostok/Zapad. Regional'nye podsistemy i regional'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij, s. 118-120. 
 46. J.D. Henderson, H. Delpart, M. Brungardt. Op. cit., p. 225. 
 47. A.L. Bennet. Op. cit., p. 227. 
 48. G. PopeAtkins. Op. cit., p. 375. 
 49. M. Carmagnani. Op. cit., p. 208. 
 50. A Companion to Latin American History, p. 411. 
 51. V.I. Blischenko, M.M. Solntseva. Regional'nye konflikty i mezhdunarodnoe pravo (vtoraya polovina KhKh - nachalo XXI veka). M., 2005, s. 415, 417.
 Kontekst: ...Formirovanie zony svobodnoj torgovli, kotoroe namechalos' esche na 2005 g., otlozheno...
 
 52. Vostok/Zapad. Regional'nye podsistemy i regional'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij, s. 130, 133. 
 53. Sistemnaya istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij. T. 3. M., 2003, s. 487-488. 
 54. The Cambridge History of Latin America. Vol. VI. Latin America since 1930. Economy, Society and Politics. Part 2. Politics and Society. Cambridge, 1994, p. 143. 
 55. S. Haggard, R. Kaufman. Op. cit., p. 262. 
 56. Vostok/Zapad. Regional'nye podsistemy i regional'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij, s. 140-141. 
 57. Promoting Democracy in the Americas, p. 44-45. 
 58. M.P. Karns, K.A. Mingst. International Organizations: the Politics and Processes of Global Governance. Boulder, London, 2010, p. 183; Promoting Democracy in the Americas, p. 183. 
 59. Promoting Democracy in the Americas, p. 45. 
 60. Z.V. Ivanovskij. Latinskaya Amerika: novye realii i korrektirovka paradigm razvitiya. - http://copy.yandex.net 
 61. M.P. Karns, K.A. Mingst. Op. cit., p. 184. 
 62. G. Philip. Democracy in Latin America: Surviving Conflict and Crisis? Cambridge, 2003, p. 91-99. 
 63. M. Serrano. Unilateralism, Multilateralism, and U.S. Drug Diplomacy in Latin America. - Unilateralisme and U.S. Foreign Policy. Boulder; London, 2003, p. 323. 
 64. V.P. Sudarev. Organizatsiya amerikanskikh gosudarstv obretaet avtoritet. - Mezhdunarodnaya zhizn', 1998, № 7. 
 65. Organizatsiya amerikanskikh gosudarstv (spravochnaya informatsiya). - http://www.mid.ru 
 66. Declaration on Security in the Americas. - http://www.oas.org/en/sms/docs 
 67. Organizatsiya amerikanskikh gosudarstv (spravochnaya informatsiya). - http://www.mid.ru/bdomp 
 68. M.P. Karns, K.A. Mingst. Op. cit., p. 184. 
 69. Despite Obama charm, Americas summit boosts U.S. isolation. - http://www.reuters.com/ article/2012/04/17. 
 70. M. Makarychev. Sammit Amerik zavershilsya bezrezul'tatno. - http://www.rg.ru/2012/04/16 
 71. Sammits of the Americas Secretariat. - http://www.summit-americas.org/sixthsummit.htm 
 72. N. Nikandrov. OAG bez SShA. Al'ternativa. - http://www.newsland.ru/news 
 73. A. Fenton. Op. cit., p. 30. 
 74. Na drugom krayu zemli. - http://blog.i.ua/user/4588913/852740 
 75. Vostok/Zapad. Regional'nye podsistemy i regional'nye problemy mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenij, s. 114.

Comments

No posts found

Write a review
Translate